NTH Consultants
Contact Us
  • Home
  • Markets
    • Energy Market
    • Industry Market
    • Water Market
    • Transportation
    • Community Development
  • Services
    • Geotechnical Engineering >
      • Geophysical Services
      • Mapping
      • Shoreline Services
      • Civil Site Engineering and Design
      • Construction Materials & Geotechnical Testing Services
      • Electric Substation Services
      • Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Facilities
      • Underground Engineering Services
      • Subsurface Utility
      • Signature Projects
    • Environmental Services >
      • PFAS
      • Ecological Services
      • Environmental Health Services
      • Environmental Remediation Services
      • Environmental Compliance
      • Environmental Permitting
      • Environmental Site Assessments
      • Ecological Services for the Energy Market
      • Air Quality Permitting and Compliance
      • Brownfield Site Redevelopment
      • Environmental, Health & Safety Training for Employee Development
      • Hydrogeologic Studies
      • Landfill Related Services
      • Site Acquisition and Redevelopment
      • Storage Tank Services
      • Signature Projects
    • Facilities Engineering >
      • Decommissioning
      • Structural Condition Assessment Rehab
      • Bridge Engineering Services
      • Asset Management Services
      • Concrete Restoration
      • GIS Services
      • Masonry Evaluation Services
      • Pavement Engineering and Consulting
      • Roofing Technology Services
      • Structural Condition Assessment
      • Signature Projects
  • Projects
  • About Us
    • Mission + Core Values
    • Leadership
    • News and Events
    • Employee Portal
  • Webinars
    • Emergency Actions Plans Webinar
  • Careers
    • Why Join NTH
    • Who We Are
    • Career Opportunities
    • NTH Internship Program
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Fifty-Feet Self-Rescue System – In Case Of A Fall

3/27/2017

0 Comments

 
By Judith W. McInerney
Corporate Health and Safety Director
Picture
As of  3/24/2017, NTH has experienced 1345 days without an injury resulting in lost time or job restriction and 668 days without a recordable injury.  This is a result of everyone’s continuing efforts; however, we as a company or as an individual must not become complacent. Therefore we are always on the look out for how safety measures can be improved.

​For example, t
o prevent NTH personnel experiencing a fall while performing tasks using an aerial lift or suspended scaffolding, various precautionary measures have been implemented.  Employees are provided training on the use and limitations of aerial lifts and/or suspended scaffolding, use of body harnesses, lifelines, short lanyards and personal fall limiters (self- retracting lifeline or self-retracting webbing). 

However, even with these control measures in place, there is still a possibility - albeit slim - that a fall could occur.  Therefore, for those instances, a method of rescue must be in place.  Although the local fire department could be called, no individual wants to be suspended for the 10 -15 minutes or more that it would take for the local fire department to arrive.  Also work involving use of aerial lifts doesn’t always take place outdoors so in some instances the fire truck wouldn’t be able to gain access to the location where the person is suspended in mid-air. To provide NTH employees a means of rescue when working in aerial lifts and suspended scaffolding, NTH recently purchased a DBI Sala rescue descent device and rescue pole.  The rescue descent device provides controlled descent upon release of a cord attached to the employee’s body harness.  The rescue pole was purchased to release the cord remotely in case an employee was unable to activate the cord (i.e. if they were unconscious).  ​
​On March 21, 2017, representatives from DBI Sala and Airgas offered NTH employees a brown bag presentation on how this piece of equipment worked.  Mary Koeger volunteered to demonstrate how the rescue descent device works.  If interested click here to watch how Mary was raised to new heights and was able to lower herself to the ground with a controlled descent.  The device that NTH purchased is rated up to 310 pounds and has 50 feet of rope.  We hope that the device will never have to be used but should its use be required, it then must be taken out of service.   
 
Ongoing efforts are taking place to ensure that “state of the art” equipment is provided to employees that effectively achieves its goal and yet is practical to use.   ​
0 Comments

Thank you to Schoolcraft massage therapists!

3/23/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Getting NTHers signed in for their appointments
Picture
Schoolcraft students get ready for their NTH clients
Yesterday as part of our Spring into Heath Event, we had the wonderful opportunity of having Schoolcraft  College Massage Therapy Clinic students in for a few hours of much needed chair massages for our NTH staff. Schoolcraft brought in five massage therapist for ten minute chair massages which was a welcome break in our week!

SC Massage Therapy is a Michigan board approved educational program that prepares graduates to become state licensed.
They offer college credit, a one year certificate in massage therapy or an associates degree in applied science - their education in therapeutic massage rooted in anatomy & physiology, kinesiology, pathology, professionalism and evidence-informed therapeutic techniques.

Students get experience in their on-campus student clinic and go out into the local community to provide chair massage at events, care centers, schools & hospitals. Companies and organizations looking to have the students at an event can call 
(734) 462-4746 or email massage@schoolcraft.edu.

They also offer individual massage appointments at very reasonable rates. You can find out more about them here.

Our staff  thoroughly enjoyed the day and want to thank the therapists for coming in!

0 Comments

EPA’s Response to the Government Accountability Office Report on Superfund Sediment Sites – Is this New Guidance?

3/21/2017

0 Comments

 
PictureKaren W. Okonta, Senior Project Professional
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) recently released guidance to regional administrators on the subject of remediating contaminated sediment sites.  The memorandum provides clarification on several Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) and risk management recommendations.  The memorandum also includes updated Contaminated Sediment Technical Advisory Group (CSTAG) operating procedures.
​
As indicated by US EPA, the purpose of the memorandum is to continue to facilitate cleanups at contaminated sediment sites subject to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the National Contingency Plan (NCP).  The memorandum discusses lessons learned in the course of overseeing and conducting cleanups at various sites. 



​The memorandum provides 11 recommendations for the characterization of sediment sites, evaluation of remedial activities, and selection and implementation of response actions, based on best practices.  The agency is encouraging administrators to consider these recommendations, especially at sites contaminated with bioaccumulative contaminants where unacceptable risk to human health from the consumption of contaminated fish or shellfish, has been determined.
Picture
​The guidance recommends:
  1. Taking early action at high-risk sites during the RI/FS study phase, even when the site has not been properly characterized.
  2. Collecting adequate data to develop and refine the conceptual site model (CSM) in support of the evaluation of alternatives. 
  3. Evaluating the risk associated with exposure to contaminated sediments, including submerged sediment.
  4. Designing site-specific sediment toxicity tests to generate data that support the risk assessment and remedy selection.
  5. Developing a monitoring strategy that clearly defines risk reduction expectations and monitoring endpoints.
  6. Incorporating an adaptive management strategy to the implementation of response action at complex sites.  The guidance also provides an example of the steps to follow when incorporating an adaptive management approach.
  7. Exercising caution when using computational models and suggests taking into consideration the limitations of models to accurately predict quantitative endpoints.
  8. Collecting adequate pre-remedial and cleanup data to interpret post-remediation data to effectively evaluate remedial measures.
  9. Developing achievable risk reduction expectations and remediation goals.  The Agency recognizes that “because of site conditions, background contamination, and limitations of available remedial technologies, achieving protective fish tissue or sediment concentration, may take many years to achieve.”
  10. Continuing collaboration with the Clean Water Act (CWA) to achieve water quality goals and the protection of public health and the environment.  It proposes that sharing of data collected at a superfund site, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits, impaired water designation and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) development, or RI/FS and long-term monitoring data, can leverage the authorities of each program.  
  11. Considering the future of the waterbody in developing alternatives for remediation, and evaluating whether the selected remedy may create an obstruction to navigation channels. 

Note that although this memorandum appears to be a new guidance, it is not significantly different from other guidance documents, and serves mostly to provide clarification to previously issued guidance documents, while addressing the recommendation of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report released in October 2016: GAO-16-777,   Superfund Sediment Sites – EPA Considers Risk Management but Could Clarify Certain Procedures.

While the memorandum provides updated guidance for documenting the evaluation process for larger sediment contamination sites (>10,000 yds3 or 5 acres), it does not advance the issue of trying to determine actual cleanup criteria for contaminated sediments.

A PDF copy of the memorandum can be accessed at https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/196834.pdf
0 Comments

Executive Order on the Clean Water Act Proposed Rule Roll Back – What does it mean?

3/13/2017

0 Comments

 
By Karen Okonta, NTH Project Professional
Picture
On February 28, 2017, President Trump signed an executive order that asks new EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt to begin the process of repealing and replacing the “Waters of the United States” rule.  The Clean Water Rule, published in June 2015 as a technical rule, was an effort by the US EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers to clarify which streams and wetlands fall under federal clean water protection and avoid case-by-case determinations.

The rule, as explained by US EPA, protects navigable waterways and their tributaries that are, or show signs of, flowing water such as a bed, bank, or high water mark, and headwaters that have connection to downstream water.  The rule also protects waters that are next to rivers and lakes and their tributaries and protects the nation's regional water features when they impact downstream waters.  In addition, the rule limits protection to ditches that are constructed out of streams or function like streams and can carry pollution downstream, and maintains the status of waters within municipal separate storm sewer systems.  

The rule excludes manmade bodies of water, prior converted cropland, and ditches with ephemeral flow or do not flow, either directly or through another water, into a waters of the United States.  Artificially irrigated areas, constructed lakes and ponds, reflecting pools, groundwater, including groundwater drained through subsurface drainage systems, and stormwater control features constructed to convey, treat, or store stormwater are also excluded. 

There have been many challenges to the rule since it was published in 2015.  Opponents of the rule, which include the U.S Chamber of Commerce, manufacturers, farmers, real estate developers, and golf course owners, among others, have stated that the rule is over reaching by defining ditches and intermittent streams as “waters of the U.S.” and stated that the rule would cause undue burden on businesses and industry.  The main complaint is that the rule would require property owners to permit every ditch or puddle on their land, and significantly hinder economic development.

In his executive order, President Trump asked Scott Pruitt to consider the late justice Scalia’s opinion issued in 2006 on the subject, which provided protection to wetlands only if they had a continuous connection to navigable waterways and extended protection only to permanent streams. 

The rule, however, cannot be repealed through executive order.  It will have to go through the federal rule making process to replace it with a proposed rule.  The rule has been, and is currently, on hold after a stay issued on October 9, 2015, by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

For more information on water resources, please visit our Water Resources Market page.
0 Comments

Project Update: Center Township Water Authority River Intake

3/9/2017

1 Comment

 
​This project demonstrated resourcefulness in planning and design as well as innovations during construction.  It was carefully and safely constructed with consideration for delivering quality drinking water and completed on a very aggressive schedule. ~ ASCE Pittsburgh

PictureBy Heather Audet, P.E.
The primary purpose of this project was to replace the existing community water supply wells with an intake on the Ohio River.  The wells were located in the footprint of a multi-BILLION dollar industrial project and needed to move and were also in need of an update since they were almost 70 years old.  The Center Township Water Authority needed to go from  a groundwater source to the river, and additional treatment was also needed.  As part of this design-build project, NTH worked with Trumbull Corp., the contractor, to come up with a design for a 3 million gallons per day (MGD) temporary water intake which was to come online during the construction of the 5 MGD permanent intake.  The site is very small, and only has room for a 10-foot wide truck lane . 

In addition, it was in the middle of an active slope failure, and had no utilities or existing access.  One idea was to float some pumps on a barge in the river.  The barge sunk when a large ice flow ripped a hole in the side.  The new solution for the temporary intake was to construct a circular sheet pile shaft  with the pumps all housed in a heated enclosure. 

Once this was done, the team set to getting the permanent intake completed.  The permanent intake was constructed using secant pile shaft with two intake pipes that were tunneled into the river. There is still plenty of work to happen on the permeant intake.  Trumbull hasn’t bottomed out the shaft yet, but they are close, and the concrete shaft still needs to be poured.  Then the mechanical equipment comes in.  The river bank elevation is more than 300 feet lower than the water treatment plant, so really big pumps are needed to move the water up the hill for treatment and supply.  

AWARD WINNING WORK!
This project has received two awards and its not even yet complete!
  • 2016 Industrial Project of the Year from the Engineering Society of Western Pennsylvania 
  • 2016 ASCE Pittsburgh Award of Merit

​Some pictures from the project are included below:

1 Comment

    The NTH Narrator

    NTH Consultants, Ltd. (NTH) is a nationally recognized engineering firm specializing in Civil, Geotechnical, Environmental, and Facilities Engineering. 

    On our blog, our engineering experts address current news and events in our field, review new projects and highlight NTH news.

    Tweets by @nthconsultants

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    November 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015